Are designer handbags linked to illegal deforestation? – DW – 06/28/2025

Leather from cattle raised in deforested areas and on Indigenous land in the northern Brazilian state of Para is being turned into luxury items in Italy, according to an investigation.

Designer brands such as Coach, Fendi and Hugo Boss have been listed as buyers of raw materials sourced from destroyed forests in Para, the northern Brazilian state set to host the UN Climate Conference, COP30, in November.

The allegations, which most companies have denied, are detailed in a report published by Earthsight, a UK-based nonprofit focused on environmental and injustice investigations. Their findings draw on thousands of records of Brazilian leather exports, data on the cattle sector, court rulings and satellite imagery, as well as interviews and on-the-ground research.

"Consumers probably expect that when buying a luxury product, the high price tag guarantees some level of ethics and sustainability," Lara Shirra White, an Earthsight researcher, told DW. "They don't expect that the leather bag might be linked to deforestation and human rights violations."

The NGO warns of products made from the hides of cattle reared on farms embargoed for environmental violations, including some operating illegally within Para's Apyterewa Indigenous Territory, which was heavily deforested during the presidency of Jair Bolsonaro from 2019 to 2022.

As part of its research, Earthsight investigated the business operations of Frigol, a Brazilian meatpacking company identified as one of the buyers of cattle raised on the territory.

The report says at least 17,000 animals were sold to Frigol between 2020 and 2023, which is "enough to produce 425 tons of leather."

Researchers linked some of those cattle to illegal farms but said it's not possible to determine the exact number that left Apyterewa, in part because Frigol itself "does not trace most of its indirect suppliers."

The report says this gap in reporting leaves the company's "supply chain vulnerable to the widespread practice of 'cattle laundering,'" in which cows from illegal farms are transferred to legally registered properties before being sold.

This browser does not support the video element.

Paulo Barreto, senior researcher at the Brazilian conservation and sustainable development Institute of Man and Environment of the Amazon, Imazon, said control over indirect suppliers is either nonexistent or incomplete.

"As a result, cattle raised in illegally deforested areas end up entering the market as if they were legal. The lack of a transparent public system regarding the origin of the cattle makes control difficult."

Frigol, however, told DW via email that it does not purchase cattle from Indigenous lands and monitors 100% of its direct suppliers.

"We are committed to working together with industry institutions, the production chain and public authorities to make progress," the company said in a statement. It added that it believes "only individual traceability of animals for socio-environmental purposes will make it possible to mitigate deforestation across all links of the cattle supply chain."

According to Earthsight's research, after the animals are slaughtered at Frigol's facilities, a percentage of cow skins are exported, in part by the Brazilian leather company Durlicouros, which shipped 14,700 tons of hide to Italy between 2020 and 2023. Some of that, the report found, went to the Italian tanneries Conceria Cristina and Faeda.

The research lists high-end names like Coach, Fendi, Chloé, Hugo Boss and Saint Laurent among Conceria Cristina's clients. Faeda, meanwhile, provides leather to brands such as Chanel, Balenciaga and Gucci, according to the investigation.

In response to a DW request for comment, Chanel cited deforestation as a "major concern" and said it no longer works with Faeda due to unmet traceability requirements: "92% of the calfskin we use is sourced from Europe, and we audit slaughterhouses and farms outside Europe to ensure they are not in deforestation zones."

The Kering Group, which owns Balenciaga, Gucci, and Saint Laurent, told DW that while the two Italian companies mentioned in the report are suppliers, "the leather they provide to any Kering house does not come from Brazil."

Based on Earthsight's findings, Hugo Boss issued a statement to say it had conducted a detailed review, and could "confirm that none of the leather" it is supplied with "is connected to any of the alleged parties in connection with the investigation."

LVMH, which owns Fendi and Louis Vuitton, said it has a system capable of tracing the origin of 98% of the leather used in its products and that it does not source this from South America. And Tapestry, which owns the Coach brand, wrote to DW saying that while the system for tracking raw materials in Brazil is "complex and imperfect," it is working to be "part of the solution to improve traceability and transparency."

Chloé, Conceria Cristina and Faeda had not responded to a DW request for comment at the time of publication.

Durlicouros told DW that it tracks its indirect suppliers and participates in discussions on state and national models for full traceability and compliance."In addition, all Durlicouros facilities are certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), ensuring high standards of sustainability, traceability, and environmental responsibility, according to the purpose of each facility."

But Earthsight researcher Lara Shirra White said companies often use the certification to vouch for the ethics and sustainability of the leather they produce "instead of conducting meaningful due diligence themselves to ensure their supply chains are deforestation-free."

She said the problem with the LWG, founded in 2005, is that "it does not require traceability back to the farms," and can therefore not account for environmental and human rights abuses in the areas where the cattle are raised.

The LWG told DW it is enhancing its "due diligence requirements related to deforestation and land conversion," which will "include establishing a chain of custody system that would support more detailed traceability across the leather value chain."

There is some hope that the European Union's Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) could make a contribution to change. Due to come into effect at the end of this year after a 12-month delay, it will ban the purchase of products originating from destroyed forest areas.

"We hope the law will be implemented on schedule, despite certain sectors of the industry still trying, in some way, to exclude leather from the scope of the legislation," Rafael Pieroni, a researcher at Earthsight, told DW.

However, he said the report also contains a message for the Brazilian government. "It should implement traceability and make all data public. Transparency is the best way to avoid all the illegalities we are exposing in our investigation," he said.

This article was originally written in Portuguese.

Edited by: Tamsin Walker

Every day, tons of used clothes arrive at the Kantamanto market in Accra, one of the world's largest secondhand textile markets. With a flick of the wrist, traders cut open the huge packages and sort piles of clothes according to quality. The tightly packed plastic bales weighing up to 100 kilograms (220 pounds) are distributed among the on-site sellers.

Early in the morning at the sprawling market in Ghana's capital, shoppers push their way through the piles of clothing. They're looking for bargains or designer items on offer at the market stalls. The piles are a mixture of used and new low-quality clothing imported from the West.

Some of the imported garments arrive in such poor condition that traders are forced to immediately dispose of them to make room for the next shipment. Neither Ghana's rapidly growing population of 34 million people, nor the country's overburdened infrastructure, can cope with the immense volume of clothing.

However, young, innovative designers are raising hopes that the major fast fashion problem can at least be brought under control, to some extent. Old clothes, especially from Europe, have long been tailored, dyed and traded on the market. Various organizations are bringing together young people and fashion designers to find creative ways of putting discarded materials to good use.

In October, the Obroni Wawu upcycling festival was also held in the immediate vicinity of the market. The name comes from an expression that means "the clothes of the dead white man" in the local Akan language. The organizers see the event as a small way to break a destructive cycle that has made Western overconsumption an environmental problem in Africa.

The designs are extravagant and unique, with plenty of glamour and glitter. Models present special outfits on the catwalk that designers have made from discarded materials from the Kantamanto market. The collection ranges from flowered blouses and denim jeans to leather bags, hats and socks, and shows how something new can be created from something old.

"Instead of allowing the textile waste to choke our gutters or beaches or landfills, I decided to use it to create something for us to use again," explains one of the designers at the annual festival, which is organized by the Or Foundation, a nonprofit organization that works at the intersection of environmental justice and fashion development.

The flood of old clothes into Africa has led to criticism that the continent is being used as a dumping ground. Discarded clothing used to be rare on Ghana's beaches, but this has changed drastically in recent years with the growing problems in waste management. Volunteers regularly come together to clean the beaches around Accra of old clothes and garbage that have washed up.

This aerial view illustrates just how polluted the beaches in Ghana are. But the numerous creative initiatives in Accra are a sign of hope for a better future. They could also encourage Western society to pay more attention to the fast fashion problem in many African countries, and help promote more sustainable consumer behavior.